Mention the phrase ‘hair-dryer treatment’ and most sports followers will think immediately of one  name – Sir Alex Ferguson, the widely-acclaimed and highly-successful manager of Manchester  United for twenty-seven years. Alongside the phrase ‘Fergie-time’ (time being added on at the end  of a match to allow his team to score!), he is known as much for his hair-dryer as for his trophies!  

Well might we wonder why such a term is associated to a soccer manager! Are male changing rooms  the natural habitat of hair-dryers? Leaving aside such a thought, we may well reflect a moment  though on what is meant by the ‘hair-dryer treatment’. Perhaps it is to do with the fact that the  coach is so incensed, so hot under the collar, that he breathes out his angry tirade, like the loud and  heated exhalation of air from the hair-dryer. Are we meant to believe that the angry coach’s hot  breath could dry a player’s hair as the furious words come out inches away from the player’s face?  

Of course, the phrase ‘hair-dryer treatment’ often is associated, perhaps bizarrely, with ‘flying  boots’, as Ferguson was alleged to have kicked or thrown boots at his players when ranting off about  their performance on the field, on one occasion famously hitting the superstar David Beckham on  the eyebrow with a flying boot. That provides a far more aggressive tone to the expression; the ‘hair dryer treatment’ is loud and furious.  

It is a given that, at any level, a key aspect of the coach’s job is to inspire and motivate his players to  reach a certain acceptable standard, befitting their level, age, experience and ability. If the players  fall short of that, then the coach must endeavour to find a way to raise them up (not pull them  down). It is often a very difficult task to do that, as the members of the team all have different  characters, interests, methods of motivation and sensitivities.  

Some will argue that when a coach becomes so incensed with the performances of his players, there  are times when it might be appropriate to consider the ‘hairdryer treatment’; some players benefit  more from such a direct, full-throttled, loud-mouthed approach – they need to be told firmly how  unacceptable their performance or attitude is. It perhaps is also intended to rouse the player so  much into his own angry state that he will go out and play more aggressively (though it may also  make them play wildly and out of control).  

It needs to be stated, however, that such an approach must never be used on children. In very  simple terms, a coach must coax. There is no place for hair-dryers in children’s sport. For a start, the  coach should never lose his cool so much that he shouts or breathes fire; how can he see things  clearly if his head is full of red mist, anger or frustration? Secondly, the coach should be far more  mature, as the adult, to stay calm; losing his temper and shouting is not going to enable to see or  work things out clearly. In truth, shouting at children is far more likely to cause them to go even  further into their shell in fear and trembling, or, if they become incensed, lose all their control.  

We might well see a child scream and shout and holler because he does not get his way but that is  on account of his immaturity; a coach should be mature enough to see that such an approach does  not work with children. The coach who cries out in desperation and anger, “I’m a good coach: why  

don’t you get this?” is immediately showing that in fact he is not a good coach (if he was, they would  have got it) but in fact a bad coach (as they have not got it). The coach’s job at school level is  somehow to find a way to tease improvement out of the player. They are to coax, to gently,  persistently, persuasively encourage and influence the children to greater effort, ability and  achievement.  

Ironically, the very image of a coach using the ‘hair-dryer treatment’ would have, for many years in  many changing rooms, caused an even greater outburst of angry words from the coach as sports  players would have been seen to be tough, macho, rugged, aggressive competitors who would never  use a hair-dryer on their hair! It is time (Fergie-time even – never too late) that we woke up and  understood this, to boot. Hair-dryer treatment at schools is a hoax; a coach must coax. Get it? 

Stay up to date

Sign up our newsletter to get update information and insight.

Related Article

COOL SIGHTINGS

There is a wonderful, and very telling, scene in the hugely popular 1993 film Cool Runnings (a film loosely based on the true story of Jamaican sprinters who, having failed

PRETENTIOUS DRIVEL OR PROSAIC DOGMA

When we choose a sports team, we select players primarily on their ability in their specific position; that is fair enough. The problem comes, however, when we come to consider

BLOCK HEAD

Charles Schulz first introduced the world to Charlie Brown in 1950 in his Peanuts cartoons. While in later years Snoopy, Charlie Brown’s dog, received more attention and popularity, Charlie Brown